Search for: "Levy v. State Of California"
Results 1 - 20
of 526
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
8 May 2012, 9:37 am
Vanity responded to the letter by filing for declaratory relief against the denim giant stating that the "V" design on the back of its jeans is "visually distinctive" from Levi's jeans and that "Levi Strauss does not have the right to prevent Vanity from using a stylized version of the letter 'V' in connection with its pocket designs. [read post]
22 Apr 2008, 1:10 am
The case is titled Levis Strauss & Co. v. [read post]
6 Sep 2022, 7:51 am
(Grover v. [read post]
17 Oct 2010, 12:42 pm
Lawyers defending Martinez v. [read post]
5 Nov 2020, 1:17 pm
The individual plaintiffs in California v. [read post]
10 Feb 2011, 10:59 am
" Compare Levi Strauss v. [read post]
24 Jun 2019, 6:00 am
In a 2011 decision, Sullivan v. [read post]
9 Aug 2016, 2:40 pm
Pavlovich, who did not reside in or have any contact with California, has resisted being forced to defend the case in that state. [read post]
10 Jul 2009, 4:58 pm
Franchise Tax Board, challenges the right of the FTB to levy the LLC fee on LLC's that do business entirely in California. [read post]
16 Aug 2010, 1:25 pm
In a foreshadowing of United States v. [read post]
23 Apr 2008, 11:35 am
Pink: Many states, including California, have statutes requiring the state to pay damage awards levied against state officials for acts performed in the course of their official duties. [read post]
2 Oct 2006, 4:58 pm
Neisendorf v. [read post]
4 Mar 2010, 7:49 am
California law provides that a writ of execution may be issued "in the county where the levy is to be made. [read post]
20 Oct 2008, 3:00 pm
Levi, Dean andProfessor, Duke Law School, and former Chief Judge, United StatesDistrict Court for the Eastern District of California (Chief Justice) Thomas R. [read post]
8 Jul 2020, 2:06 pm
State of California (1987) 190 Cal.App.3d 521, 550; see Kruger v. [read post]
31 Aug 2016, 7:00 am
California Supreme Court opens door for state reimbursing local agencies for unfunded mandatesDepartment of Finance v Commission on State Mandates, California Supreme Court, S214855Source: Meyers Nave Legal Alert A Meyers Nave Internet Newsletter reports that on August 29, 2016 the California Supreme Court handed a victory to local agencies that are seeking to enforce their constitutional right to reimbursement for unfunded mandates imposed by… [read post]
30 Dec 2011, 1:05 pm
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 9:21 am
., the Antitrust and Unfair Competition Law Section of the State Bar of California will present a webinar on Rose and Zhang. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
4 Feb 2020, 6:00 am
Supreme Court’s South Dakota v. [read post]
